16 Aug 2007, 10:18
sid wrote:mito wrote:Income assessed aswell. No job, no kid(s).
Why mito ??? What you are saying is people should be in full time employment before they can have kids, So when the kids are born the parents go back to work and the kids get stuck in day care with total strangers I THINK NOT
I was out of work for most of my kids been born so you saying i shouldnt have my kids, I dont get sh*t all off the goverment so if you on about your taxes ect you can shove them up your arse
16 Aug 2007, 18:15
No. I think one parent should be working and the other at home looking after them, at least until they're at school. Although its not an ideal world and lots of parents both have to work.sid wrote:mito wrote:Income assessed aswell. No job, no kid(s).
Why mito ??? What you are saying is people should be in full time employment before they can have kids, So when the kids are born the parents go back to work and the kids get stuck in day care with total strangers I THINK NOT
16 Aug 2007, 18:35
16 Aug 2007, 18:38
Gaz wrote:So what the f*ck has this lot got to do with rip off ticket prices, Start your own thread
16 Aug 2007, 19:21
mito wrote:Gaz wrote:So what the f*ck has this lot got to do with rip off ticket prices, Start your own thread
No.
I blame Jock
16 Aug 2007, 19:46
daffers wrote:
And back on topic, I agree with ya Gaz
17 Aug 2007, 08:50
Gaz wrote:And yes, I blame Jock too
17 Aug 2007, 09:44
.Jock wrote:... when I was young, I heard the phrase, "Children should be seen and not heard" a lot. I took umbrage to that, believing children should have a voice, but now as I get perhaps a little wiser, I understand it - it means keep your f*cking kids quiet in public! ....
17 Aug 2007, 11:07
.Jock wrote:Gaz wrote:And yes, I blame Jock too
I am assuming you are blaming me because I say what I think.
17 Aug 2007, 11:25
Gaz wrote:No, I blame you for hijacking my thread
17 Aug 2007, 18:29
25 Aug 2007, 18:24
© Copyright Local Bikers, powered by phpBB.
Style by Artodia.